Advances and Progress of Guideline Methodology

GRADE SERIES

1. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(10)00330-6/fulltext）

2. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(10)00331-8/fulltext）

3. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(10)00332-X/fulltext）

4. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(10)00413-0/fulltext）

5. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(11)00181-8/fulltext）

6. GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(11)00206-X/fulltext）

7. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(11)00182-X/fulltext）

8. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(11)00183-1/fulltext）

9. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(11)00184-3/fulltext）

10. GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(12)00134-5/fulltext）

11. GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(12)00025-X/fulltext）

12. GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables—binary outcomes

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(12)00032-7/fulltext）

13. GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(12)00240-5/fulltext）

14. GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(12)00138-2/fulltext）

15. GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation—determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(13)00054-1/fulltext）

16. GRADE Guidelines: 16. GRADE evidence to decision frameworks for tests in clinical practice and public health

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(16)00136-0/fulltext）

17. GRADE guidelines 17: assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant outcome data in a body of evidence

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(16)30811-3/fulltext）

18. GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(17)31031-4/fulltext）

19. GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences—Risk of bias and indirectness

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(17)31036-3/fulltext）

20. GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences—inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(17)31061-2/fulltext）

21. GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(19)30673-0/fulltext）

22. GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(19)30674-2/fulltext）

23. GRADE guidelines: 22. The GRADE approach for tests and strategies—from test accuracy to patient-important outcomes and recommendations

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(17)31095-8/fulltext）

24. GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(19)30416-0/fulltext）

25. GRADE guidelines 27: how to calculate absolute effects for time-to-event outcomes in summary of findings tables and Evidence Profiles

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(19)30422-6/fulltext）

26. GRADE Guidelines 28: Use of GRADE for the assessment of evidence about prognostic factors: rating certainty in identification of groups of patients with different absolute risks

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(19)30873-X/fulltext）

27. GRADE Guidelines: 29. Rating the certainty in time-to-event outcomes—Study limitations due to censoring of participants with missing data in intervention studies

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(20)31101-X/fulltext）

28. GRADE Guidelines 30: the GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence—An overview in the context of health decision-making

（https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(20)31103-3/fulltext）

RIGHT SERIES

1. A Reporting Tool for Practice Guidelines in Health Care: The RIGHT Statement

(https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/abs/10.7326/M16-1565)

2. The reporting checklist for public versions of guidelines: RIGHT-PVG

(https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13012-020-01066-z)

3. The RIGHT Extension Statement for Traditional Chinese Medicine: Development, Recommendations, and Explanation

(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043661820314869)

4. RIGHT for Acupuncture: An Extension of the RIGHT Statement for Clinical Practice Guidelines on Acupuncture

(https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(21)00173-6/fulltext)

5. A Reporting Tool for Adapted Guidelines in Health Care: The RIGHT-Ad@pt Checklist

(https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/full/10.7326/M21-4352)

6. An extension of the RIGHT statement for introductions and interpretations of clinical practice guidelines: RIGHT for INT

(https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jebm.12466)

7. Developing the RIGHT extension statement for practice guideline protocols: the RIGHT-P statement protocol

(https://f1000research.com/articles/11-275)

最新注册

指南解读

1 《2020中国系统性红斑狼疮诊疗指南》解读

数据库

指南方法学前沿与进展

指南制订机构

指南制订手册

指南制订数据库

儿童COVID-19治疗建议指南

《全球证据委员会报告》（中文版）发布会

首届国际跨学科知证决策方法学培训班